Inside Nigeria’s Alleged Coup Plot: How A Promotion Dispute, Military Grievances & Intelligence Operation Unravelled The Conspiracy
By NJORIGE LYNUS
An Alleged Coup Plot Rooted in Personal Ambition & Institutional Discontent
FRESH details emerging from confidential investigation documents have provided a rare insight into the motivations, planning and eventual collapse of the alleged coup plot against President Bola Tinubu’s administration, revealing how a combination of personal ambition, perceived institutional injustice and broader dissatisfaction within sections of the military allegedly culminated in one of Nigeria’s most sensitive national security investigations in recent years.
At the centre of the investigation is Colonel Mohammed Ma’aji, a Nigerian Army officer accused of leading a conspiracy to overthrow the democratically elected government. According to documents reviewed by investigators, Ma’aji allegedly viewed repeated failures to secure promotion to the rank of brigadier general as a turning point that influenced his decision to revive plans for an unconstitutional change of government.
The revelations, contained in statements made during military interrogations and supported by investigative records, paint a picture of an officer who combined personal career frustrations with broader concerns about insecurity, military welfare and dissatisfaction among serving personnel to justify what investigators describe as an organised attempt to subvert constitutional order.
Promotion Frustration & the Evolution of an Alleged Plot
According to investigative records, Ma’aji had sought promotion to brigadier general since 2023 but was unsuccessful on two separate occasions.
He reportedly told investigators that after missing promotion the first time, he began discussing the possibility of political intervention through unconstitutional means. Although those discussions allegedly attracted the attention of security authorities, no evidence was then considered sufficient to justify criminal prosecution.
The officer stated that he was invited by the Defence Intelligence Agency during the 2023 election period following allegations that politicians intended to use him to disrupt the general elections. His mobile phone was reportedly subjected to forensic examination before he was released after investigators found no evidence linking him to the alleged activities.
Rather than ending the matter, investigators say the experience merely interrupted the alleged conspiracy.
Documents indicate that after Ma’aji failed to secure promotion again in 2024, discussions surrounding the alleged coup resumed with greater intensity.
According to his own account, several junior officers encouraged him to revive the movement because they feared he might be compulsorily retired before attaining higher rank.
Investigators believe this marked the point when preliminary conversations allegedly evolved into structured planning involving logistics, recruitment, fundraising and operational coordination.
Military Welfare Emerges as Central Narrative
Although investigators allege that the conspiracy constituted a direct threat to constitutional governance, Ma’aji consistently presented a different explanation during interrogation.
He claimed the initiative was driven primarily by concerns over deteriorating welfare within the Armed Forces.
According to his statements, many serving and retired military personnel face poor salaries, inadequate housing, declining morale and insufficient institutional support despite the enormous risks associated with military service.
He argued that frustrations had become widespread among officers and soldiers, claiming that many personnel believed existing leadership structures were no longer adequately addressing their concerns.
Investigators note that references to welfare appeared repeatedly throughout handwritten notes allegedly recovered from his residence.
Previous investigative reports have also indicated that the alleged conspirators prepared preliminary policy ideas centred on reviewing fuel subsidy removal, improving salaries for security personnel and recognising fallen military heroes.
Security analysts suggest these proposals may have been intended to create public legitimacy for an unconstitutional government should the alleged conspiracy have succeeded.
The Intelligence Operation That Ended the Alleged Plot
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the investigation concerns the circumstances surrounding Ma’aji’s eventual arrest.
According to his statement, military intelligence officers allegedly exploited his long-standing desire for promotion to draw him into what he believed would be an official meeting with the Chief of Army Staff.
He claimed he received telephone calls instructing him to report to Niger Barracks for discussions concerning his delayed promotion.
The invitation appeared genuine.
He said the Army Chief personally assured him that his promotion issues would receive attention, reinforcing his confidence that his career ambitions were finally about to be realised.
Upon arriving at the meeting, discussions reportedly began with questions regarding his promotion history, military courses and career progression.
However, the situation changed dramatically following the arrival of the Chief of Defence Intelligence.
Ma’aji alleged that he was instructed to accompany the intelligence chief to collect a message intended for a retired senior military officer.
Believing the assignment formed part of the promotion process, he followed the intelligence convoy to Defence Intelligence Agency headquarters.
Instead of receiving official correspondence, he found himself inside an interrogation room where investigators confronted him with details of the alleged coup plot.
According to his account, investigators informed him that another suspected conspirator had already been arrested while additional suspects were either under surveillance or had fled.
Investigations formally commenced from that moment.
An Expanding National Security Investigation
The alleged conspiracy has since evolved into one of Nigeria’s largest military criminal investigations in recent history.
More than forty military personnel, police officers and civilians have reportedly been linked to various aspects of the investigation.
Serving officers are currently facing trial before military courts while retired officers and civilian suspects are being prosecuted before the Federal High Court in Abuja.
Court proceedings have continued to examine allegations involving recruitment, logistics, reconnaissance, communications and operational planning.
Several defendants have challenged the admissibility of statements and other evidence, arguing that investigative procedures violated provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act.
Those objections remain part of ongoing judicial proceedings.
Constitutional Questions Beyond the Courtroom
Beyond the criminal allegations, the investigation has reignited national debate regarding military welfare, institutional reforms and civil-military relations.
Security experts note that although welfare concerns within the Armed Forces have frequently been raised by serving and retired personnel, constitutional democracies provide established channels through which such grievances should be addressed.
Analysts argue that improving conditions of service, strengthening institutional accountability and expanding internal grievance mechanisms could reduce frustrations without undermining democratic governance.
Military authorities have repeatedly maintained that discipline, professionalism and constitutional loyalty remain fundamental obligations for all serving personnel regardless of institutional challenges.
As judicial proceedings continue, the case represents not only a criminal prosecution but also a broader examination of military leadership, institutional resilience and Nigeria’s capacity to safeguard democratic governance against internal security threats.
– CLICK HERE TO READ THE PREVIOUSLY 7TH PART OF THIS SERIES
