Inside The Alleged Plot Against Tinubu: Money, Military Networks & The Coup That Never Happened
By NJORIGE LYNUS
NIGERIA’S long and troubled relationship with military intervention appeared to cast another shadow over the country in 2025 when reports emerged that serving and retired military officers were under investigation over an alleged plot to overthrow the administration of President Bola Tinubu.
For months, however, the public knew little about what had actually happened.
The initial arrests came with limited explanations. The Defence Headquarters first described the matter as part of a routine internal process aimed at maintaining discipline and professionalism within the armed forces. Authorities later confirmed that the officers were being investigated in connection with an alleged coup plot.
That confirmation answered one question but created many others.
Who allegedly planned the operation? What motivated them? How far did the conspiracy progress? Was there a fixed date for the takeover? Who provided the money? Were civilians involved? How close did the alleged conspirators come to carrying out their plans?
A 16-part investigation based on thousands of pages of records, including statements, bank documents, handwritten notes, digital chats, receipts and other exhibits, attempted to reconstruct the alleged conspiracy from its earliest stages to its eventual collapse.
The resulting picture is one of an alleged network driven by a mixture of personal grievances, dissatisfaction with governance, military welfare concerns, financial arrangements and political calculations.
It is also a story that remains legally unresolved.
Several of those implicated are facing prosecution, while some defendants have challenged the admissibility of statements and video evidence relied upon by investigators. The allegations have therefore not been finally determined by the courts.
The Officer at the Centre of the Investigation
At the centre of the alleged conspiracy was Colonel Mohammed Ma’aji of the Nigerian Army.
Investigators identified him as the principal coordinator of the alleged plot.
Records reviewed in the investigation suggest that Ma’aji’s frustration with his military career may have intersected with broader political and institutional grievances. He reportedly failed twice to secure promotion to the rank of brigadier general, first in 2023 and again in 2024.
According to his account, those disappointments contributed to his decision to revive discussions about changing the government.
Yet the alleged motivations went beyond promotion.
Ma’aji reportedly cited insecurity, corruption, poor governance, economic hardship, the removal of petrol subsidy and the welfare of serving and retired military personnel as factors that influenced his thinking.
His handwritten notes reportedly contained proposals for a future government, including a review of the petrol subsidy removal, improved salaries and welfare for military and security personnel, and greater recognition for soldiers who die in service.
Those concerns reflect issues that have generated significant public debate in Nigeria.
The crucial distinction, however, lies in the method allegedly contemplated by the suspects.
The documents suggest that the alleged participants did not merely discuss political dissatisfaction. Investigators believe they discussed using military force to remove an elected government.
Grievances, Ambition & the Search for Change
The alleged plot illustrates a recurring tension in societies facing economic hardship and insecurity.
When citizens and institutions become dissatisfied with government performance, frustration can create a climate in which radical political alternatives gain attention.
Nigeria has experienced such moments repeatedly in its history.
Military coups once became a defining feature of the country’s political development. Governments were overthrown in the name of correcting corruption, insecurity, economic mismanagement or political instability.
Yet military intervention frequently produced its own cycle of repression, instability and further dissatisfaction.
The alleged 2025 plot appeared to draw from some of those familiar arguments.
The suspected conspirators reportedly expressed concern about the welfare of military personnel and the country’s security situation. Some also reportedly opposed the economic consequences of petrol subsidy removal.
But investigators also uncovered evidence of personal ambition.
The proposed structure of the alleged post-coup government reportedly included discussions about who would occupy key positions after the takeover.
Ma’aji was allegedly expected to become Head of Government.
Other alleged participants reportedly anticipated positions ranging from ministerial offices to appointments in security institutions.
That combination of ideological language, institutional grievances and personal ambition complicates any simple attempt to portray the alleged conspiracy as either purely political or entirely personal.
How the Alleged Takeover Was Expected to Work
Investigators believe the alleged conspirators developed plans to seize strategic locations in Abuja and other parts of the country.
Targets reportedly included the Presidential Villa, military formations, the residences of senior military commanders, Radio House, Air House and airports.
The alleged plan required the coordinated deployment of troops, gun trucks, vehicles, ammunition and personnel from different formations.
Some participants allegedly received specific assignments.
One officer was reportedly expected to lead activities connected to the Presidential Villa. Others allegedly had responsibility for military formations and strategic facilities.
Another participant was expected to take control of Radio House and broadcast an announcement after the anticipated takeover.
The alleged conspirators also reportedly developed coded language to conceal the nature of their discussions.
They allegedly referred to themselves as “farmers” and their activities as “farming.”
Logistics were reportedly described as “fertilisers,” clerics as “technical partners,” while the planned operation itself was allegedly referred to as “digital farming.”
The proposed execution day was reportedly known as “harvest.”
The coded terminology demonstrates an awareness among the alleged participants that ordinary communication could expose them.
Investigators also found evidence that some of the suspects used encrypted messaging platforms, including WhatsApp and Zangi.
The Uncertain Date of the Alleged Coup
Despite the detailed discussions, the records suggest that the alleged conspirators never settled on a final execution date.
Three dates reportedly surfaced repeatedly: 27 September, 1 October and 4 October 2025.
Another possible date was mentioned as a month after 1 October.
The uncertainty appeared to reflect logistical difficulties.
According to one suspect, the eventual “D-Day” would depend on the availability of troops, weapons and equipment.
The proposed time for the operation, known as “H-hour,” was reportedly between 1 a.m. and 2 a.m.
The choice of the early hours reportedly reflected the historical pattern of military takeovers, many of which occurred when government institutions and much of the civilian population were least prepared to respond.
The absence of a fixed date, however, raises an important question about how operationally prepared the alleged network actually was.
The documents suggest planning and preparation.
They do not establish that the alleged conspirators had reached the final stage of execution before authorities disrupted the operation.
Money & the Alleged Financing Network
One of the most consequential aspects of the investigation concerns the alleged movement of money.
Ma’aji reportedly told investigators that former Bayelsa State governor and former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva, was the principal financier of the alleged plot.
The investigation records reportedly examined financial transactions involving companies, bank accounts and a bureau de change operator.
Investigators believed that more than ₦5 billion may have been pooled through an account allegedly connected to the financing network, while about ₦785 million was allegedly transferred for activities associated with the planned operation before the plot collapsed.
Records reportedly showed that approximately ₦474.7 million had been disbursed to individuals and entities between 10 and 30 September 2025.
Some of the alleged recipients were military officers, civilians and Islamic clerics.
One officer reportedly assigned to activities connected with the Presidential Villa allegedly received ₦10 million.
Another allegedly connected with airport operations reportedly received ₦5 million.
The financial allegations, if established through admissible evidence, could become central to determining whether the alleged conspiracy moved beyond discussion into organised preparation.
But the existence of allegations or investigative findings does not amount to a judicial finding of guilt.
Any determination of criminal responsibility must ultimately rest on evidence tested through the legal process.
A Political Figure Enters the Picture
The alleged mention of Timipre Sylva introduced a major political dimension to the investigation.
The former governor and minister was identified in Ma’aji’s reported account as a key financier.
The allegation immediately raised the stakes because it suggested that the suspected network may have extended beyond serving and retired military officers.
Another retired officer reportedly told investigators that Ma’aji asked him to approach wealthy and influential individuals for financial support.
The name of the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, reportedly came up in those discussions.
However, the retired officer said he did not approach Wike or secure financial support from him.
The records therefore do not establish that Wike participated in or financed the alleged plot.
This distinction remains important.
An individual mentioned during an investigation is not necessarily an accused person, participant or sponsor.
Investigators must distinguish between names discussed in private conversations and evidence establishing actual involvement.
The Search for Spiritual Protection
The alleged conspiracy also reportedly had a spiritual dimension.
Investigators said Ma’aji sought the support of Islamic clerics and other individuals for prayers and spiritual protection.
One cleric was allegedly paid about ₦50 million in instalments.
The payments were reportedly linked by investigators to spiritual support for the anticipated operation.
The reliance on clerics and spiritual advisers reportedly troubled some alleged participants.
One officer told investigators that Ma’aji’s association with spiritual figures contributed to doubts about his judgement and suitability for leadership.
Those doubts formed part of a wider pattern.
Several individuals allegedly connected with the plot reportedly questioned whether Ma’aji possessed the resources, discipline or leadership capacity required to organise such a complex operation.
A Bloodless Coup—or an Unpredictable Operation?
Several alleged participants reportedly said they wanted to avoid bloodshed.
One major who was allegedly assigned to make a nationwide broadcast after the takeover reportedly advised Ma’aji against killing senior officers.
Another participant reportedly opposed the use of lethal force.
The alleged operational plan appeared to focus initially on arresting senior commanders, securing strategic locations and disrupting key government facilities.
One proposal reportedly involved cutting electricity to the Presidential Villa to facilitate entry.
A maintenance employee at the Villa reportedly warned that a sudden power outage would immediately trigger suspicion and expose workers on duty to investigation.
According to his account, the alleged planners then considered the possibility of using force if insiders failed to cooperate.
The documents also indicate that some participants explored the possibility of recruiting members of the Civilian Joint Task Force and repentant Boko Haram fighters.
That aspect of the alleged plan could have significantly increased the risk of violence.
Any operation involving irregular armed groups would have raised serious questions about command, discipline and control.
Even if the original planners intended to limit casualties, events could have developed beyond their control.
History offers repeated evidence that political violence rarely remains as controlled as those who initiate it expect.
The Plan for Public Support
The alleged conspirators reportedly understood that controlling government buildings would not automatically secure public legitimacy.
They therefore allegedly discussed a campaign to create the impression that Nigerians supported the new order.
A veteran Nollywood actor, Stanley Amandi, reportedly told investigators that he was asked to coordinate public mobilisation in the South-east.
His alleged responsibilities included organising celebrations and engaging social media influencers to promote messages supporting the anticipated government.
The existence of such an alleged plan demonstrates how modern political interventions increasingly extend beyond soldiers and weapons.
Information has become another battlefield.
A successful takeover would require not only control of physical institutions but also the ability to influence public perception, dominate digital conversations and present a new political narrative.
The alleged propaganda strategy reflected that reality.
Doubts Within the Alleged Network
Perhaps the most striking feature of the investigation is that many of those allegedly connected to the plot appeared unconvinced that it would succeed.
Some reportedly questioned Ma’aji’s ability to secure funding.
Others doubted whether he could obtain the troops and equipment required for a nationwide operation.
A naval lieutenant commander reportedly became so sceptical that he stopped responding to Ma’aji’s messages.
He later said he regretted not reporting the discussions to authorities.
Another retired naval officer reportedly said he repeatedly advised Ma’aji against the plan and suggested that he retire from the military if frustration over promotion had become unbearable.
At one point, he reportedly suspected that the entire arrangement could have been an elaborate scheme to obtain money from wealthy individuals who might be too compromised to report the matter.
The doubts did not necessarily prevent alleged participants from attending meetings, maintaining contact or, in some cases, receiving funds.
That contradiction may become one of the most important issues in the trials.
At what point does knowledge become participation?
When does silence become complicity?
The courts may eventually have to examine the actions of each defendant individually rather than treating the alleged network as a single, uniform group.
The Plot That Collapsed Before Execution
The alleged conspiracy finally began to unravel in September 2025.
Ma’aji was arrested on 29 September.
According to his account, military authorities allegedly used his long-standing desire for promotion as a way to bring him to a meeting.
He reportedly believed he had been summoned to discuss his promotion prospects.
Instead, he was arrested.
The investigation subsequently widened, leading to arrests, interrogations and prosecutions.
The most significant conclusion from the available records is that the alleged coup was never executed.
There was no military takeover.
There was no occupation of the Presidential Villa.
There was no broadcast announcing a new government.
Authorities say they disrupted the alleged conspiracy before it reached that point.
The Questions That Remain
The allegations nevertheless leave Nigeria with important questions.
Were warning signs within the military ignored until the alleged conspiracy reached an advanced stage?
Did dissatisfaction over welfare, promotion and institutional conditions contribute to the willingness of some officers to consider unconstitutional political change?
How effective are existing internal channels for addressing grievances within the armed forces?
Could stronger welfare systems and better communication mechanisms reduce the risk of similar developments?
These questions do not excuse an alleged attempt to overthrow a democratic government.
They do, however, point to the importance of understanding the environment in which such ideas can emerge.
Some of the alleged suspects themselves reportedly recommended better welfare, stronger education, improved communication channels and reforms aimed at reducing corruption and perceived favouritism.
Those concerns can be addressed within constitutional institutions.
The attempt to impose political change through military intervention, if the allegations are eventually proved, would represent an entirely different matter.
Democracy, Due Process & the Burden of Proof
The alleged plot has reopened a subject that many Nigerians believed belonged largely to the country’s past.
For more than two decades, Nigeria has sustained an uninterrupted period of democratic rule.
The mere possibility of a military conspiracy therefore carries historical and political significance.
Yet the seriousness of the allegations also makes due process essential.
The courts must determine what evidence is admissible, credible and sufficient.
Several defendants have challenged their extrajudicial statements and video recordings, arguing that investigators obtained them in circumstances that violated legal safeguards.
The prosecution has urged the court to admit the evidence.
Those disputes remain part of the judicial process.
Until the cases are concluded, the allegations against the defendants remain allegations.
The investigation may have reconstructed an extraordinary account of money, coded messages, military assignments, political grievances and ambitious plans for a new government.
But the final account will not be written by investigators or journalists.
It will depend on what the evidence can prove in court.
For Nigeria, the broader lesson may be equally important.
A democracy cannot assume that the conditions that once produced military intervention have disappeared simply because coups have become less common.
Economic hardship, insecurity, institutional grievances and political distrust can create dangerous openings.
The answer, however, lies not in returning to the era of military rule.
It lies in strengthening democratic institutions, improving accountability, addressing legitimate grievances and ensuring that those accused of serious crimes receive a fair trial.
The alleged coup against the Tinubu administration may have failed before a single shot was fired.
Its consequences, however, could extend far beyond the courtroom if Nigeria fails to confront the underlying tensions exposed by the investigation.
HERE IS THE CONCLUSION OF THIS SERIES.
-CLICK HERE TO READ THE PREVIOUSLY 16TH PART OF THIS SERIES
