Robinson Plaza Tenants Protest Alleged Harassment By Gbagi Family
Tenants Raise Alarm Over Alleged Harassment
TENANTS of Robinson Shopping Plaza in Warri have called on government authorities and law enforcement agencies to intervene in what they describe as ongoing harassment by members of the family of late Kenneth Gbagi.
The shop owners alleged that the situation escalated following the death of the plaza’s owner, leading to disputes among his children over control of rental payments.
Dispute Over Rent Collection
According to accounts gathered, the crisis began when one of the deceased’s children instructed tenants to pay rent into a designated account. However, another sibling reportedly rejected the arrangement, insisting that payments be made directly to him as the eldest son.
The disagreement is said to have triggered a series of confrontations, including the alleged locking of shops by one of the family members.
Tenants claim that more than 150 shops have been affected, preventing them from accessing their businesses and sustaining their livelihoods.
Court Intervention and Orders
In response to the dispute, nine tenants jointly approached the Delta State High Court seeking legal protection.
Delivering a ruling, Justice Emudainohwo N. E. of High Court No. 3, Warri, ordered that tenants be granted unhindered access to their shops and continue their businesses without interference.
The court also directed members of the Gbagi family to maintain the status quo and refrain from locking or evicting tenants without a valid court order.
Calls for Compliance and Resolution
Despite the court’s directive, tenants allege that disruptions have persisted, prompting renewed calls for enforcement of the ruling.
Human rights activist Israel Joe urged the family to comply with the court order and resolve their internal disagreements amicably.
He noted that the ongoing conflict has created uncertainty and hardship for traders who depend on the plaza for their daily income.
Growing Concerns
The tenants emphasised that without urgent intervention, the dispute could further disrupt business activities and affect livelihoods, calling on authorities to ensure compliance with the court’s decision.
