Anioma State: A Path To Development & Representation
THE call for the creation of Anioma State has once again taken centre stage in Nigerian political discourse, sparking debates about geography, identity, and the future of the Anioma people. For proponents, including many from the region, the case is clear: Anioma belongs firmly in the South-South, despite attempts by some to blur regional lines for political convenience. Geography, after all, is a fact, not a matter of opinion.
Beyond the politics, the creation of Anioma State represents a transformative opportunity for development. A new state would bring increased political representation, higher federal allocations, and a sharper focus on infrastructure projects. Local governance would be more accessible, public services would improve, and job creation could accelerate, offering a real chance to uplift communities that have long felt underserved. Proponents argue that these tangible benefits make state creation not just desirable but imperative for progress.
Yet, amid the push for development, debates over identity have emerged. Some politicians have attempted to redefine or question the identities of the Anioma people, creating unnecessary friction. For many, including Ukwuani indigenes from Abbi, identity is clear, distinct, and constitutionally recognized. Anioma State, they insist, must focus on advancing the collective good rather than being co-opted for political maneuvering.
At its heart, the movement for Anioma State is about development, representation, and a stronger voice in national affairs. The region’s leaders and people see it as a vehicle to ensure that local concerns are heard, addressed, and prioritized, offering a roadmap toward a more prosperous and empowered Anioma.
Creating Anioma State is more than a political debate—it is a statement about self-determination, progress, and the right of a people to shape their destiny.
