Tensions Rise In Aniocha South Over Claims Of Community Land Seizures
Renewed Allegations Over Land Ownership in Delta Community
FRESH tensions have emerged in Ogwashi-Uku, Aniocha South Local Government Area of Delta State, following renewed allegations of land grabbing, intimidation, and destruction of farmlands involving disputed parcels of community land.
The Young Nigerian Rights Organization, led by activist Comrade Victor Ojei, has rejected claims by the Palace of the Obi of Ogwashi-Uku that recent allegations circulating within the community are false or politically motivated. The group insists that multiple testimonies from affected residents point to a pattern of land disputes that require independent investigation.
At the centre of the controversy are allegations concerning the alleged takeover of agricultural lands, including a government-supported farming cluster near Admiralty University, as well as reported displacement of youth farmers under the state’s Youth Agricultural Entrepreneurs Programme (YAGEP).
Competing Narratives Between Palace and Activists
While the Palace has previously dismissed such claims as misinformation, the activist group maintains that such denials do not address what it describes as “persistent reports” from farmers and residents across Aniocha South.
According to the rights group, several communities have raised concerns about fencing activities, restricted access to ancestral farmlands, and alleged intimidation linked to land ownership disputes.
The organisation argues that custodianship traditions should not be interpreted as ownership rights over communal lands, stressing that all land-related actions must remain subject to Nigerian statutory law.
Calls for Independent Investigation
The group has also questioned the transparency of earlier investigations conducted at the state level, alleging that findings may not have fully reflected the experiences of affected communities.
It is calling for a fresh, independent inquiry by the Delta State Government and relevant security agencies, including a forensic review of earlier reports and recommendations.
According to the organisation, only a transparent process can restore public confidence and address what it describes as widening mistrust between communities and traditional institutions.
Escalating Tensions and Accountability Demands
The activist group insists it will continue documenting complaints from residents, describing its actions as part of broader civic accountability efforts.
It further warned against what it called attempts to suppress whistleblowers and civil society voices, arguing that public institutions must remain open to scrutiny in land governance matters.
As the dispute continues, calls are growing for calm and structured engagement between stakeholders to prevent further escalation in affected communities.
